Register
FAQ
Today's Posts
THE DAEMON TOOLS FORUM
Quick Links
Copy Methods, Questions Post everything about Copy Methods here!

Tip: System Errors? Click here to Fix your PC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

  #21
Old 17.10.2009, 14:51
New User
 
Join Date: 25.04.2009
Posts: 12
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

Quote:
Originally Posted by gf7 View Post
Scan the CD with BurnOut.
It should tell you the Laserlockversion.
BurnOut is able to detect what is described as "LaserLock" and "LaserLock Marathon" if I remember correctly what the protections.txt suggested. It did detect "LaserLock", but does it imply any specific version, however?

Another question: Is there a LaserLock version which people never have been able to work around that you know (that is, one from the 1990s, given my CD was released in 96-97)?
Popup-Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
  #22
Old 19.10.2009, 14:48
experienced user

 
Join Date: 27.09.2005
Posts: 780
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

well 32 bit laserlok is relatively simple to crack, however such discussions are frowned upon on the forum, 16 bit is a bit trickier, but its essentially the same check, where it looks for the developers name in the laserlok.in file, and does other small checks, it should be emulatable with daemon tools, but because its 16 bit, you might have problems running it on xp etc.. it definately will not work on an x64 based system, the version number also isn't always stored in the exe (if anywhere), so tracking the exact version might be a bit tricky
__________________
my views are 100% personal views..
evlncrn8 is offline   Reply With Quote
  #23
Old 20.10.2009, 18:48
gf7
New User
 
Join Date: 20.02.2008
Posts: 9
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

@evlncrn8: Right, but it works as you can see. But shouldn't we stay on topic?
__________________
BurnOut
-the Open Source protection scanner-
gf7 is offline   Reply With Quote
  #24
Old 21.10.2009, 16:20
experienced user

 
Join Date: 27.09.2005
Posts: 780
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

i am, but i wanted the question answered properly, and with my other posts i did stay on topic and 'it works, as you can see' isn't exactly accurate either, i can make a text file which will be reported as laserlok too, which is why i asked you about processing 16 bit exe's
__________________
my views are 100% personal views..
evlncrn8 is offline   Reply With Quote
  #25
Old 21.10.2009, 16:59
New User
 
Join Date: 25.04.2009
Posts: 12
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

Quote:
Originally Posted by evlncrn8 View Post
it should be emulatable with daemon tools, but because its 16 bit, you might have problems running it on xp etc.. it definately will not work on an x64 based system, the version number also isn't always stored in the exe (if anywhere), so tracking the exact version might be a bit tricky
Interesting clarifications, but I run it (the original) in a simulated DOS environment using Virtual PC anyway, so the XP, x64, x32 etc. issue is not a problem. The core seems to be that this particular kind of laserlock is an excessively tricky one to get around.
Popup-Box is offline   Reply With Quote
  #26
Old 21.10.2009, 17:45
experienced user

 
Join Date: 27.09.2005
Posts: 780
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

so, making the image and 'forwarding' the daemon tools drive in virtualpc etc doesn't work? does it see anything in the drive, or does it give a 'put original disk in drive' style error?
__________________
my views are 100% personal views..
evlncrn8 is offline   Reply With Quote
  #27
Old 21.10.2009, 19:24
New User
 
Join Date: 25.04.2009
Posts: 12
Default Re: Detecting correct LaserLock version

Quote:
Originally Posted by evlncrn8 View Post
so, making the image and 'forwarding' the daemon tools drive in virtualpc etc doesn't work? does it see anything in the drive, or does it give a 'put original disk in drive' style error?
It's about half a year since I actually attempted to solve the problem, so I may have forgotten a few details. However, I tried both to burn the image on an empty CD as well as mounting the image as a virtual drive. The content is detected, I was able to browse the files, categories of the copy, but not to run the program properly. As far as I remember, I focused more on burning it to the empty CD than mounting virtual representations, so there might be the potentiality that I did not try a particular solution (a specific type of burning setting associated with a specific image creator) re the mount method, but should it matter? I tried e.g. Clony, DaemonTools etc., ridiculously many, since different programs provide for varying burning/image settings. Hence, my idea is to find out precisely what type of laserlock I'm struggling with.
Popup-Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:35.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2   Forum Copyright © 2000-2010 THE DAEMON TOOLS FORUM
Contact Us DAEMON-Search.com Web Store: Disc-Soft.com