Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lame question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lame question

    how can i subscribe for "announcement" forum, not specific thread? or it is not possible at all?

    (i check homepage everyday just can't stop)

  • #2
    Originally Posted by HueponiK
    how can i subscribe for "announcement" forum, not specific thread? or it is not possible at all?
    On the left side: Forum, select "Announcements" on the right, click on "Forum Tools" on the upper right of the page. Choose "Subscribe to this forum" from the list.

    Originally Posted by HueponiK
    (i check homepage everyday just can't stop)
    You do have a live as well, don't you?
    The Boardzombie's website.

    Comment


    • #3
      How does it come that some people have 0 posts?
      Like HueponiK, he wrote on message know, or maybe it is just an imagination.

      I suppose it is bug.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally Posted by Methadon
        or maybe it is just an imagination.
        I guess his pet is called a Schroedinger's cat.
        The Boardzombie's website.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally Posted by Nemerov
          I guess his pet is called a Schroedinger's cat.
          Wasn't that some kind of crazy experiment?

          Comment


          • #6
            Schroedingers cat is dead, isn't it?

            The reason for the postcount is that the board counts the
            posts in some kind of "scheduled tasks", or in other words:
            cronjob.

            Therefore you will experience a slight delay between some
            things that the board performs at night (to save some CPU-
            power).

            It is NOT a bug but a feature

            Comment


            • #7
              @Methadon: It is about an hypothetical experiment - not a
              real one. Most physic-students and chemical students
              know about it

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally Posted by LocutusofBorg
                @Methadon: It is about an hypothetical experiment - not a
                real one. Most physic-students and chemical students
                know about it
                Well I'm none of the above mentioned, but I know that it was something about killing a cat in some crazy way.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally Posted by LocutusofBorg
                  Schroedingers cat is dead, isn't it?
                  If schrodinger's cat is still in the box, it's still just a waveform. It's both dead and alive at the same time according to quantum law. Isn't that wierd?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally Posted by estimablesir
                    It's both dead and alive at the same time according to quantum law. Isn't that wierd?
                    not from a quantum-view of things

                    apart from that I want you to take a look to the damn cat -
                    et voila: dead

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I see why this topic is in the OFF-topic section!
                      A women is like a hurricane, it start wet and heavy and when it's over you've lost your house

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally Posted by Eight-8all
                        I see why this topic is in the OFF-topic section!
                        Yeah, after Nemerov's answer (the first reply) there was no need of further posting.
                        It's my fault, sorry.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally Posted by estimablesir
                          If schrodinger's cat is still in the box, it's still just a waveform. It's both dead and alive at the same time according to quantum law. Isn't that wierd?
                          Well, the experiment was about sub-particles (I think), not stuff as big as cats. I believe Schrodinger used a cat to make it more understandable.

                          All in one, it meas: If a "quantum" (what's that?) is there, we don't know its state. We have to scan it first. But if we scan it, we are "disturbing" it (we interact with it). Before that, it can be in two states at the same time. At the moment the interaction happens, it chooses one of two states.

                          Weird. I think the quantum computer will utilize that (and implement uncrackable encryption).
                          To contact me privately, pray. I might answer.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally Posted by Nikos
                            All in one, it meas: If a "quantum" (what's that?) is there, we don't know its state. We have to scan it first. But if we scan it, we are "disturbing" it (we interact with it). Before that, it can be in two states at the same time. At the moment the interaction happens, it chooses one of two states.

                            Weird. I think the quantum computer will utilize that (and implement uncrackable encryption).
                            Stop it Niko! You know Starforce will probably implement this if they read it!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally Posted by Xristaki
                              Stop it Niko! You know Starforce will probably implement this if they read it!
                              LOL

                              123456789
                              To contact me privately, pray. I might answer.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X