OS: Windows XP SP1
AV: Norten 2003 Pro
IS: Alchol 120%, WinISO
BS: Nero 5
BD: Light-On DVD Muti (-r/rw & +r/+rw)
DT: 3.46
Hello all, I've layed in the shdows around here alot. But I just realized some thing. I'm a bit slow I guess. LOL
WinISO's file stream copy (1:1 as I understand it) rather than the ASPI imaging option worked to help me eliminate the threat of damageing a Play disc (NWN for example). But when there was the issue with UT2K4 (I know the new official patch removes the CD check) I did a file copy on the UT2K4 play CD and it wouldn't do a valid Secure Rom 5 check...
Is there some thing stored in the Alchol image that can't be stored int an ISO?
Would this mean File nor ASPI copy do a true 1:1 copy?
Is I understod it Secure Rom would be copied as dumby data with a 1:1 copy, has this changed with Secure Rom 5?
Just some questions that poped in my head as I sat here.
Maybe I should start being more active.
AV: Norten 2003 Pro
IS: Alchol 120%, WinISO
BS: Nero 5
BD: Light-On DVD Muti (-r/rw & +r/+rw)
DT: 3.46
Hello all, I've layed in the shdows around here alot. But I just realized some thing. I'm a bit slow I guess. LOL
WinISO's file stream copy (1:1 as I understand it) rather than the ASPI imaging option worked to help me eliminate the threat of damageing a Play disc (NWN for example). But when there was the issue with UT2K4 (I know the new official patch removes the CD check) I did a file copy on the UT2K4 play CD and it wouldn't do a valid Secure Rom 5 check...
Is there some thing stored in the Alchol image that can't be stored int an ISO?
Would this mean File nor ASPI copy do a true 1:1 copy?
Is I understod it Secure Rom would be copied as dumby data with a 1:1 copy, has this changed with Secure Rom 5?
Just some questions that poped in my head as I sat here.
Maybe I should start being more active.
Comment