So it seems the current trend of these nasty back breaking protections is to encrypt everything and it also seems that they are reverse enginiering D-tools to find ways to stuff things into the protections which recognise d-tools and/or the way it works so heres my idea...
How about D-tools becoming encrypted just like the copy protections at the moment so that it cant be so easily stopped being used? When I say this I mean implement some form of encrpytion/protection that stops the copy protection from knowing whats really going on, the encryption key could be unique to the hardware its running on thus stopping the protection from having "snapshots" stored of what D-tools could look like. Basically it would be like having protection fighting off the protection.
Crazy idea and I admit im no programmer but is this possible or anything?
Keep up the great work guys, I hope to be investing in the pro version when its released as this software has saved me countless problems in the past and IMHO its worth every penny!
How about D-tools becoming encrypted just like the copy protections at the moment so that it cant be so easily stopped being used? When I say this I mean implement some form of encrpytion/protection that stops the copy protection from knowing whats really going on, the encryption key could be unique to the hardware its running on thus stopping the protection from having "snapshots" stored of what D-tools could look like. Basically it would be like having protection fighting off the protection.
Crazy idea and I admit im no programmer but is this possible or anything?
Keep up the great work guys, I hope to be investing in the pro version when its released as this software has saved me countless problems in the past and IMHO its worth every penny!
Comment