i was accidently reading through all this about true backup copies and stuff so i'd like to give my opinion about that.
when it comes to burning, i would always prefer to burn the image file itself. even if it is possible to create a running backup, who can say if you can get another copy of that copy later on?
with the working image stored away you can always make another working copy as the data doesn't have to be read out of the cd again.
EDIT:
i understand you want to stay independent from daemon tools, but that's something i do not really understand. when setting up a new machine, dt is one of the first things to install for me. once you start using images more frequently it becomes indispensable to have it installed. the nice side-effects like emulation for non-perfect (physical) copies makes it even more attractive and it is so small you can almost always burn it together with the imgae onto a cd.
sorry for advertising that much for dt, but ... it's the dt forum here, so what.
got my point?
when it comes to burning, i would always prefer to burn the image file itself. even if it is possible to create a running backup, who can say if you can get another copy of that copy later on?
with the working image stored away you can always make another working copy as the data doesn't have to be read out of the cd again.
EDIT:
i understand you want to stay independent from daemon tools, but that's something i do not really understand. when setting up a new machine, dt is one of the first things to install for me. once you start using images more frequently it becomes indispensable to have it installed. the nice side-effects like emulation for non-perfect (physical) copies makes it even more attractive and it is so small you can almost always burn it together with the imgae onto a cd.
sorry for advertising that much for dt, but ... it's the dt forum here, so what.
got my point?
Comment